Cases of interest

Below are details of pertinent animal law cases and reasons for judgement:
Attachments:
FileDescriptionDateFile size
Download this file (Whaling.pdf)Public interest, and whalers’ violation of Aust. Court injunction consideredJapanese whalers fail to injunct Sea Shepherd in US Court19 March 2012138 Kb
Access this URL (http://www.austlii.edu.au/au/cases/cth/FCAFC/2006/116.html)Humane Society International Inc v Kyodo Senpaku Kaisha LtdThe case concerned an application in the Federal Court of Australia for an injunction and declaration to restrain Japanese whaling in the Australian Whale Sanctuary adjacent to Antarctica.14 July 200660 Kb
Access this URL (http://www.austlii.edu.au/cgi-bin/sinodisp/au/cases/cth/FCA/2010/1511.html?stem=0&synonyms=0&query=pisano)Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v C.I. & Co Pty Ltd Case about misleading and deceptive conduct in the labelling of caged eggs as “free range”23 December 20100 Kb
Access this URL (http://www.bawp.org.au/attachments/article/35/RSPCA-SA-v-Leonard%20Newton-Sentencing-Remarks.pdf)RSPCA (SA) v NewtonSentencing Remarks on Penalty of Mr C Kitchin SM. Prosecution Counsel were provided by BAWP, Mr Hore-Lacy SC and Ms P Marcou. 3 December 20103265 Kb
Download this file (Case Note - Hoffmann-La Roche.doc)Hoffmann – La RocheCase Note: Hoffmann – La Roche v Secretary of State for Trade [1975] AC 29514 October 201028 Kb
Access this URL (http://www.austlii.edu.au/au/cases/vic/VSC/2010/335.html)Environment East Gippsland Inc v VicForests Supreme Court of Victoria11 August 2010594 Kb
Download this file (6 8. Rural Export v Hahnheuser 220808.pdf)Rural Export Trading v HahnheuserReasons for judgment of Full Federal Court in Rural Export Trading (WA) Pty Ltd v Hahnheuser22 August 20081079 Kb
Download this file (5 10. Emanuel Exports_Magistrates Court Decision 080208.doc)DLGD v Emanuel ExportsReasons for judgment in Department of Local Government & Development v Emanual Exports PL & Ors.14 February 2007189 Kb
Access this URL (http://www.animallaw.info/nonus/cases/cabrsuicaeng2005.htm)Suica v BrazilFirst case to consider that a chimpanzee might be a legal person to come before the court. Source: Michigan State University College of Law28 September 200548 Kb
Access this URL (http://www.austlii.edu.au/cgi-bin/sinodisp/au/cases/cth/FCA/2005/290.html?stem=0&synonyms=0&query=newkirk)Australian Wool Innovation Limited v NewkirkCase about sufficiency of AWI’s pleading in case against PETA about its threatened boycott of Australian wool products22 March 20050 Kb
Access this URL (http://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWCA/Civ/2002/337.html)A v B & CEngland and Wales Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Decision11 March 20020 Kb
Access this URL (http://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWHC/Ch/2001/31.html)Imutran Ltd v. Uncaged Campaigns Ltd & AnorEngland and Wales High Court (Chancery Division) Decision11 January 20010 Kb
Access this URL (http://www.austlii.edu.au/au/cases/cth/HCA/2001/63.html)ABC v Lenah Game Meats Pty LtdHIgh Court of Australia15 November 20010 Kb
Access this URL (http://www.austlii.edu.au/au/cases/cth/HCA/1997/31.html)Levy v VictoriaDuck shooting case - High Court of Australia31 July 19970 Kb
 
BAWP Logo
The BAWP logo symbolises a barrister standing before the scales of justice. The scales of justice are depicted at the top of the logo and the inverse triangle at the foot of the logo represents the row of curls, known as 'buckles', at the back of the wig together with its looped tail.
Search

All materials posted to this website are for general information only and are not offered by way of advice or to be relied upon for that purpose. The Barristers Animal Welfare Panel expressly disclaims any responsibility for the accuracy of the materials posted to this website.

BAWP logo designed by Simon Kingsford of Scimitar Online. BAWP website designed and developed by Lana Went. BAWP website maintained by Ethical Design

Joomla template created with Artisteer.

escort bayan escort bayan